A $1.7M loss, turned into $430M.
There was no retail product when I joined, only a thesis that wasn’t landing. A design-led initiative took it from MVP to tested app to an independent brand my team created: Aspero. From a $1.7M loss in FY23 to $430M in FY25.
The market thesis was real and enormous: a ₹226 trillion bond market with under 5% retail participation, while 53% of India’s household financial assets sat parked in fixed deposits. The barrier was never money. It was fear, complexity, and low trust in financial platforms. Yubi’s fixed income business had genuine B2B heritage serving wealth distributors and advisors, but the retail attempt, then carrying the Yubi Bonds name, wasn’t landing. FY23 closed at a $1.7M loss, and internally the appetite for another try was thin.
This is the moment most companies hand to a product team with a backlog. Yubi handed it to design. Not to redesign an app, because there was no app worth redesigning, but to find out whether a retail fixed income business could exist at all, and what it would have to feel like.
We refused to build the full product on an unproven thesis. The working hypothesis was written on the wall: if we simplify financial complexity and make safety feel visible, users will trust enough to act. Everything else became a test of that sentence.
The evidence base came first: 200 surveys across Tier 1 to 3 users, 80+ in-depth interviews across two age cohorts, five expert sessions with financial advisors, ethnography in Tier 2 markets, usability tests, and Amplitude funnel analysis. The findings were sharp: 62% of users couldn’t define “yield”, 42% dropped at the PAN step out of data-misuse fear, and 68% preferred FD safety, summed up by one interviewee: FDs feel like a promise, bonds feel like a gamble. Each finding mapped to a behavioural principle, loss aversion to security cues, trust heuristics to familiar palettes and known issuer logos, framing to plain language, overload to curated lists.
The biggest kill was the hardest one: the umbrella brand itself. The hypotheses kept converging on the same finding, retail investors would not extend trust to a name built for institutional lending. The product didn’t need a better interface. It needed its own identity.
The zero-to-one phase ran on a deliberately small pod: three designers, one researcher, and one content strategist, run as a single unit across what would normally be three departments. My team created the Aspero brand end to end: the name, the identity, the voice, all built around calm and certainty instead of fintech noise. As the platform scaled, so did the squad, to 14 across product, motion, and system design, with DesignOps practices (async design reviews, sprint retrospectives) lifting delivery velocity by 60%.
The operating rhythm was executive by design: weekly reviews with the CEO, CFO, and CPO on hypotheses and business metrics, never mockups. And the team itself became an outcome: 95% designer retention against an industry average of 72%, and four promotions earned along the way.


The research said it plainly: the enemy wasn’t ignorance, it was anxiety. Every mechanism below exists to convert one specific fear into one specific moment of confidence.



My team named the gradient Firefly: growth green rising into optimistic yellow, over a deep ink neutral. The ascending mark reads as a peak, a roof, and an upward arrow at once. Familiar enough to feel safe, fresh enough to feel nothing like an institutional lender, which was precisely the point.

FY23 closed at a $1.7M loss under the old direction. FY25 closed at $430M, with 20,000+ active investors on a platform that started with fewer than 300, an average order value of ₹68,000, and 32% of Yubi’s revenue contributed along the way. Aspero launched as an independent brand in October 2023 and now stands as its own SEBI-registered platform.
Aspero settled two convictions. First, design can lead a zero to one, not just polish one, if it is accountable to business hypotheses rather than screens. Second, trust is not a coat of paint. Sometimes the most important design decision is the name on the door.